"NSA Clarita Santos, totoo po ba di kayo naniniwala na may nirerecruit na students ng UP ang mga makakaliwa or NPAs? Please enlighten me maam," post ng isang netizen.
"The professors in the university present our students with a buffet of choices on what political philosophy to believe in, when they enroll in our classes.
As young adults, they choose which path to take, and take responsibility for their choices.
We don't choose for them," sagot ng professor.
Pinapatanong naman ito ng isang netizen at pinapasagot lamang ang professor ng yes or no.
Ang mga pahayag na ito ay mula sa isang National Security Secretary, ang nagbibigay ng credibility question mula sa mga netizens.
Bukod pa rito, ng sabihin ng bagong NSA na hindi siya sang-ayun sa red tagging at sa pagpayag nito na pumasok ang ICC sa bansa upang imbestigahan ang diumano'y injustice sa kasagsagan ng Anti-drug campaign ng Pamahalaang Duterte.
Napansin din ng mga netizens na panay ang painterview nito sa media. Kinakatakot ng ilan na baka ang ilang mga controversial issue ay mailabas. Ilan lamang ang mga bagay na ito sa mga naging dahil sa panawagan na ilipat ng pwesto si Professor Carlos at hindi umano ito nababagay sa NSA.
Pabor naman sa nasabing panawagan ang isang retired air force commander. Ayon sa kanya, mas nababagay umano si Professor Carlos sa DNA at baka nalalagay umano sa alanganin ang seguridad ng bansa at ng pangulo.
Ayon sa isang DDS warrior na si Krizzette Laureta Chu,
Me"
Narito naman ang pahayag ng retired air force commander na si Romeo Poquiz na tila pagsang-ayon sa naunang pahayag ni Krizzette,
"Unwanted Attention on the NSA
There is a ruckus among those in the armed services - from the retired military men especially, about the fitness of Professor Clarita Carlos as National Security Adviser. I personally vouch for her competence to provide a wider perspective on national security.
Judging from her public pronouncements which sometimes contravene the President's own policy and those of existing defense and security policies, however, she is viewed as a security risk and therefore must not be involved in crafting security policies and strategies, the soldiers say.
She also intends to avail of the services of civilian scholars to help her craft a revised national security strategy. These scholars may not have the required security clearances and must not be allowed to handle classified info. Lives are always at stake in the defense and military establishment that is why military men talk only when needed. There is also a strict protocol for the handling of classified information and operations. It is a culture different from civilians.
There is also a perception of the professor's lukewarm reception of the NTF-ELCAC's purpose and continuity. As such, there is a suggestion for the agency to be instead transferred to the DND, instead of the NSA.
The NSA is a critical part of the national defense, military, and security apparatus. The NSA needs all the help for her to be able to accomplish her mandate. She cannot alienate herself from the DND/AFP. If she does, she will be left alone, isolated, and will consequently be bypassed in the chain.
My suggestion to the good professor. Stop those public pronouncements unless very necessary. Meet with the AFP. Listen carefully."
Walang komento
Mag-post ng isang Komento
Share your opinion now!